Rendered at 07:06:09 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
karmelapple 6 hours ago [-]
So glad to see color photographs of the site.
One thing I'm not so glad to see is one paragraph that starts with this sentence:
"The distinction is important. Archaeological maps..."
That "The distinction is important" smells like AI writing... but maybe we all just have to accept that now?
21asdffdsa12 10 minutes ago [-]
Remember the "IDunno" of archeology - "It most likely served ritual and cultural purposes" .. i wonder if AI adapts such a thing
azernik 1 hours ago [-]
We all have to accept that people will look at perfectly innocuous, clear, well-written prose and assume that AI wrote it.
psychoslave 5 minutes ago [-]
One can still suspect that something might not have been uttered through some AI assistance. There might even be still some living humans outside, who knows.
0xpgm 6 hours ago [-]
As more people start using AI for research, they'll probably adopt AI'isms in their writing too, even if they don't use AI itself to do the writing.
Subconsciously we all pick up patterns that we regularly encounter.
hunter-gatherer 5 hours ago [-]
I've had that happen to me. I actually recently wrote a draft blog and looked over it, and it felt AI generated. My writing style has definitely changed.
jcims 3 hours ago [-]
I've definitely picked up 'lever', I scrub it every time that I notice I write it but it's in there.
youniverse 4 hours ago [-]
Maybe we need our AI to only respond in bullet point lists.
erickhill 3 hours ago [-]
With emoji for the bullets, natch.
TomK32 2 hours ago [-]
Just put "Don't use emojis" into the prompt.
tacomagick 27 minutes ago [-]
Pass it as a memory or a system prompt and watch it forget 3 agent messages later.
3 hours ago [-]
evoluketion 3 hours ago [-]
- The
- Distinction
- Is
- Important
joegibbs 2 hours ago [-]
I have the opposite, I can pick up AIsms much more now and they stick out like a sore thumb. A couple of years ago I had no such intuition, it just sounded like normal writing to me, but now if I try to use AI to write any prose it just sounds absolutely terrible.
awesome_dude 1 hours ago [-]
This is the load-bearing result
debo_ 6 hours ago [-]
This distinction is important.
TomK32 2 hours ago [-]
Ran it through several testes, only one flagged a few sentences as AI, including the one you mention. Fair enough, it's unlikely that English is the (turkish in this case?) author's first language and a little AI help can't hurt here.
I learned a great lesson for a gamedev youtuber this summer: Use AI to give you a summary what you have to implement, what functions you'll need, what edge case you missed and then write it yourself. Putting this into practice helps me to refine the ticket I'm working on. With the last ticket I had to persuade the AI (Atlassian's Rovo in my case) that a new data model wasn't necessary and we can do it more elegantly with less code.
Many of us still have to figure out how AI fits into our workflow, letting it do all the work isn't it but asking AI to point you towards the goal and let it review/refine your work sounds a lot more acceptable to me.
protocolture 1 hours ago [-]
>testes
teehee
aprilthird2021 1 hours ago [-]
> and a little AI help can't hurt here.
Wrong wrong wrong.
Bad writing makes the reader stop thinking about what you wanted to convey. As unintuitive as it is for most people in this forum, AI writing smell is as bad as bad grammar. Doesn't matter how you get rid of it. Maybe even more AI can clean those up, but those unintuitive phrases that pop up in AI writing are going to be a hindrance for many people who would love for the focus to be on what they're presenting, not the sloppy way they've written it up
3 hours ago [-]
NegativeLatency 1 hours ago [-]
I imagine they've done some tweaking before publishing (also appears the rock substrate has flaked off), was hoping to be able to pull some more detail out of the images with a vibe coded decorrelation stretch app I made from a post last week:
One thing I'm not so glad to see is one paragraph that starts with this sentence:
"The distinction is important. Archaeological maps..."
That "The distinction is important" smells like AI writing... but maybe we all just have to accept that now?
Subconsciously we all pick up patterns that we regularly encounter.
- Distinction
- Is
- Important
I learned a great lesson for a gamedev youtuber this summer: Use AI to give you a summary what you have to implement, what functions you'll need, what edge case you missed and then write it yourself. Putting this into practice helps me to refine the ticket I'm working on. With the last ticket I had to persuade the AI (Atlassian's Rovo in my case) that a new data model wasn't necessary and we can do it more elegantly with less code.
Many of us still have to figure out how AI fits into our workflow, letting it do all the work isn't it but asking AI to point you towards the goal and let it review/refine your work sounds a lot more acceptable to me.
teehee
Wrong wrong wrong.
Bad writing makes the reader stop thinking about what you wanted to convey. As unintuitive as it is for most people in this forum, AI writing smell is as bad as bad grammar. Doesn't matter how you get rid of it. Maybe even more AI can clean those up, but those unintuitive phrases that pop up in AI writing are going to be a hindrance for many people who would love for the focus to be on what they're presenting, not the sloppy way they've written it up
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49645437
https://github.com/nburns/DecorrelationStretch